<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
<title>HashTools RSS: multi-core optimizations?</title>
<atom:link href="https://www.binaryfortress.com/HashTools/Discussions/RSS/?TopicID=d68c368e-b3f7-45d2-b324-da546282ed74" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<link>https://www.binaryfortress.com/HashTools/Discussions/RSS/?TopicID=d68c368e-b3f7-45d2-b324-da546282ed74</link>
<description>HashTools RSS: multi-core optimizations?</description>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 14:31:20 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<language>en</language>
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<generator>https://www.binaryfortress.com/HashTools/Discussions/RSS/?TopicID=d68c368e-b3f7-45d2-b324-da546282ed74</generator>
<item>
<title>RE: multi-core optimizations?</title>
<link>https://www.binaryfortress.com/HashTools/Discussions/View/multi-core-optimizations/?ID=d68c368e-b3f7-45d2-b324-da546282ed74#5</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 21:09:36 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Binary Fortress Software</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.binaryfortress.com/HashTools/Discussions/View/multi-core-optimizations/?ID=d68c368e-b3f7-45d2-b324-da546282ed74#5</guid>
<category>HashTools</category>
<description><![CDATA[Thanks for understanding.    If we do come across a way to multi-thread with large performance gains we'll try our best to integrate it.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CTDiscussions">
Thanks for understanding.  <img src="https://www.binaryfortress.com/MediaCommon/SVGs/FontAwesome/face-smile.light.svg" alt=":)" style="box-sizing:border-box;position:relative;overflow:hidden;vertical-align:middle !important;width:16px;height:16px;" HelpButtonData=":)" HelpButtonDataAlign="BelowMiddle" />  If we do come across a way to multi-thread with large performance gains we'll try our best to integrate it.
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>RE: multi-core optimizations?</title>
<link>https://www.binaryfortress.com/HashTools/Discussions/View/multi-core-optimizations/?ID=d68c368e-b3f7-45d2-b324-da546282ed74#4</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 20:34:41 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Binary Fortress Software</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.binaryfortress.com/HashTools/Discussions/View/multi-core-optimizations/?ID=d68c368e-b3f7-45d2-b324-da546282ed74#4</guid>
<category>HashTools</category>
<description><![CDATA[And most people only calculate hashes for a single file to check the integrity of downloads anyway, so maybe it's not that big of a deal.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CTDiscussions">
And most people only calculate hashes for a single file to check the integrity of downloads anyway, so maybe it's not that big of a deal.
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>RE: multi-core optimizations?</title>
<link>https://www.binaryfortress.com/HashTools/Discussions/View/multi-core-optimizations/?ID=d68c368e-b3f7-45d2-b324-da546282ed74#3</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 20:32:37 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Binary Fortress Software</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.binaryfortress.com/HashTools/Discussions/View/multi-core-optimizations/?ID=d68c368e-b3f7-45d2-b324-da546282ed74#3</guid>
<category>HashTools</category>
<description><![CDATA[The developer of that other software I think I mentioned say that in her tests, there is a performance advantage. No benchmark was made public though and no numbers given, but I suspect they didn't use SSDs. However your point is very reasonable and I see how it may not be worth the trouble.
Tha...]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CTDiscussions">
The developer of that other software I think I mentioned say that in her tests, there is a performance advantage. No benchmark was made public though and no numbers given, but I suspect they didn't use SSDs. However your point is very reasonable and I see how it may not be worth the trouble.<br/>
<br/>
Thank you for your time and for considering / answering my question. I'm sure I'll see in time that there's not much difference in the speed of both software.
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>RE: multi-core optimizations?</title>
<link>https://www.binaryfortress.com/HashTools/Discussions/View/multi-core-optimizations/?ID=d68c368e-b3f7-45d2-b324-da546282ed74#2</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 20:26:50 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Binary Fortress Software</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.binaryfortress.com/HashTools/Discussions/View/multi-core-optimizations/?ID=d68c368e-b3f7-45d2-b324-da546282ed74#2</guid>
<category>HashTools</category>
<description><![CDATA[This is an interesting idea, but unfortunately the hash-generation library we're currently using doesn't support multiple threads per file. We could process multiple files simultaneously (one on each core), but the issue with this is disk I/O. For most people (those without SSD's), hashing is bot...]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CTDiscussions">
This is an interesting idea, but unfortunately the hash-generation library we're currently using doesn't support multiple threads per file. We could process multiple files simultaneously (one on each core), but the issue with this is disk I/O. For most people (those without SSD's), hashing is bottle-necked by the I/O system, not the CPU.
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>multi-core optimizations?</title>
<link>https://www.binaryfortress.com/HashTools/Discussions/View/multi-core-optimizations/?ID=d68c368e-b3f7-45d2-b324-da546282ed74</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2014 09:21:05 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Binary Fortress Software</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.binaryfortress.com/HashTools/Discussions/View/multi-core-optimizations/?ID=d68c368e-b3f7-45d2-b324-da546282ed74</guid>
<category>HashTools</category>
<description><![CDATA[Performance suggestion
I know making the hash-generation algorithms multi-threaded is probably not possible or too difficult probably, but could you at least generate hashes for multiple files in different concurrent threads? For example, if the CPU is dual-core, two threads would be running con...]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CTDiscussions">
Performance suggestion<br/>
<br/>
I know making the hash-generation algorithms multi-threaded is probably not possible or too difficult probably, but could you at least generate hashes for multiple files in different concurrent threads? For example, if the CPU is dual-core, two threads would be running concurrently, hashing two files at a time (unless the files are on an optical drive of course).<br/>
<br/>
I know that's a lot to ask, but I figure if ExactFile can do it, that this one should too. I really love HashTools of all (and there are a lot) the hash tools out there, mainly for its usability, intuitiveness and the minimal number of GUI elements.<br/>
<br/>
It's already perfect, but this performance boost would mean a lot since we all know hash calculation takes a lot of processing (so it is time consuming) and it's a shame now that practically all CPUs are multi-core for that processing power to go to waste.<br/>
<br/>
Please let us know whether there are any plans on doing that.<br/>
<br/>
Thanks for your time and for the useful, productive and beautiful software you make.
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>